<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Side Mission - A gamers mag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidemission.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidemission.com</link>
	<description>mature nintendo wii and PS3 gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by Chris</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-505</guid>
		<description>xxstalker, you must have a Gravatar, a service that gives you a global avatar. Our comment system grabs avatars from there. that or maybe you&#039;re registered on IntenseDebate? 
 
Anyway, I obviously agree with you... the killcams looking different than what the player saw at his end, just rubs it in. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xxstalker, you must have a Gravatar, a service that gives you a global avatar. Our comment system grabs avatars from there. that or maybe you&#039;re registered on IntenseDebate? </p>
<p>Anyway, I obviously agree with you&#8230; the killcams looking different than what the player saw at his end, just rubs it in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by xxstalker24xx</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>xxstalker24xx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-504</guid>
		<description>oops i meant &quot;and i can tell you&quot;  and how did my avatar get attached to my comment when i didnt upload one O_O freaakkkyyy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops i meant &#8220;and i can tell you&#8221;  and how did my avatar get attached to my comment when i didnt upload one O_O freaakkkyyy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by xxstalker24xx</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>xxstalker24xx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I am in a clan that plays MW2 and i have put in more then 6days of playtime and i cant tell you i am totaly sick of the game because soem days you may be good, some matches you may be good, it all depends on the host and your ping.  To many times have i seen on my screen myself shooting a player only to see from his side that i DIDNT even shoot!  The game picks for you and how is that fun when your actions dont matter.  Perks dont work all the time as i have had commando and went to knife sombody and it complete ignores the attack even who its meant to block the enemy player when iam in range for the stab.


Simpel fact is the way IW have handeled the latency and situtations is totaly unfair and makes your effort ignorable due ot the fatc your being hosted by a crap host.   BC2 on the other hand makes a player require learning and rewards the player for getting himself in a situation thats stronger for his side.  blaaa the simpel fact is MW2 dosnt reward a player for having skill rather a better ping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in a clan that plays MW2 and i have put in more then 6days of playtime and i cant tell you i am totaly sick of the game because soem days you may be good, some matches you may be good, it all depends on the host and your ping.  To many times have i seen on my screen myself shooting a player only to see from his side that i DIDNT even shoot!  The game picks for you and how is that fun when your actions dont matter.  Perks dont work all the time as i have had commando and went to knife sombody and it complete ignores the attack even who its meant to block the enemy player when iam in range for the stab.</p>
<p>Simpel fact is the way IW have handeled the latency and situtations is totaly unfair and makes your effort ignorable due ot the fatc your being hosted by a crap host.   BC2 on the other hand makes a player require learning and rewards the player for getting himself in a situation thats stronger for his side.  blaaa the simpel fact is MW2 dosnt reward a player for having skill rather a better ping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by Chris</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-501</guid>
		<description>wally, maybe I&#039;ll re-write the statement intent, then. I did intend to compare contrast.. I just didn&#039;t want to write another checklisty graphics/sound/weapons/matchmaking comparo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wally, maybe I&#039;ll re-write the statement intent, then. I did intend to compare contrast.. I just didn&#039;t want to write another checklisty graphics/sound/weapons/matchmaking comparo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by Chris</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-500</guid>
		<description>bob, not the case, I played a LOT of MW2 and i&#039;m enjoying BC2 more. I win more firefights in BC2 because I enter the situation differently, there always seems to be more options for entering a situation. Take a map like karachi. lots of corridors. if the guy is at one end of the corridor, your only option is to attack him head on, or go ALLL the way around 
 
and I agree with you about slight of hand, I loved that perk (since my ping is basically always 3 bars and i&#039;m not that quick on the draw anyway).  but come on.. down-the-sight times?  that&#039;s twitch/reflex gaming.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bob, not the case, I played a LOT of MW2 and i&#039;m enjoying BC2 more. I win more firefights in BC2 because I enter the situation differently, there always seems to be more options for entering a situation. Take a map like karachi. lots of corridors. if the guy is at one end of the corridor, your only option is to attack him head on, or go ALLL the way around </p>
<p>and I agree with you about slight of hand, I loved that perk (since my ping is basically always 3 bars and i&#039;m not that quick on the draw anyway).  but come on.. down-the-sight times?  that&#039;s twitch/reflex gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by wally</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-499</guid>
		<description>-So instead of doing that, I&#8217;m just going to talk about why Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (and not Modern Warfare 2) is going to be my go-to multiplayer shooter in 2010: 
 
You should have stuck to your intent, not talking about MW2 at all, instead of doing comparisons of each. Just a basic tenement of writing.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-So instead of doing that, I&rsquo;m just going to talk about why Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (and not Modern Warfare 2) is going to be my go-to multiplayer shooter in 2010: </p>
<p>You should have stuck to your intent, not talking about MW2 at all, instead of doing comparisons of each. Just a basic tenement of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Come here&#8230; and enter our nerdy writing contest by Cialis</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/come-here-and-enter-our-nerdy-writing-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Cialis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2377#comment-498</guid>
		<description>zBNfsl Excellent article, I will take note. Many thanks for the story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zBNfsl Excellent article, I will take note. Many thanks for the story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by bob dillan</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>bob dillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-497</guid>
		<description>&quot;BC2 mastery requires the total package: good shooting, planning, sneaking, and thinking, and Modern Warfare 2 rewards the quickdraw: those with raw reflexes, and those with better ping. Period. And I much prefer (and do much better in) games that reward the former.&quot;

Period? Ha!  It&#039;s quite the opposite.  Modern Warfare 2 is a lot like Chess in that if a piece was taken from you, there were obvious a series of moves that lead up to the lost battle.  As far as pregame strategy goes you have to master each kind of weaponry and choose the best combination of pro perks, weapons, and weapon attachments.  Most people choose to prestige rather than go for pro perks and attachments so by not prestigeing you are already at a great advantage.

Some people might not be killing you because they are quicker or have a better ping, they could simple using the Sleight of Hand Pro perk which allows them to draw their weapon up more quickly.  Different types of guns have different aiming down the sight times which you have to consider if you want to play strategically.

&quot;head-on firefights where tactics don’t help much, and there are few opportunities to outthink your enemy; the dude who starts shooting straight first wins.&quot;

The guy who shoots first has always had the advantage in first person shooters.

If your strategy is to rush straight on and go head to head, and you keep losing....maybe it&#039;s time to switch up the strategy?



Believe it or not there is a lot of strategy to Modern Warfare, but if your like most game journalists you&#039;re going to judge a book by it&#039;s first few pages and then write a review on it based off of the jacket summary.

There are players out there who play well with yellow pings by adapting to their situation, rather than playing the typical victim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BC2 mastery requires the total package: good shooting, planning, sneaking, and thinking, and Modern Warfare 2 rewards the quickdraw: those with raw reflexes, and those with better ping. Period. And I much prefer (and do much better in) games that reward the former.&#8221;</p>
<p>Period? Ha!  It&#8217;s quite the opposite.  Modern Warfare 2 is a lot like Chess in that if a piece was taken from you, there were obvious a series of moves that lead up to the lost battle.  As far as pregame strategy goes you have to master each kind of weaponry and choose the best combination of pro perks, weapons, and weapon attachments.  Most people choose to prestige rather than go for pro perks and attachments so by not prestigeing you are already at a great advantage.</p>
<p>Some people might not be killing you because they are quicker or have a better ping, they could simple using the Sleight of Hand Pro perk which allows them to draw their weapon up more quickly.  Different types of guns have different aiming down the sight times which you have to consider if you want to play strategically.</p>
<p>&#8220;head-on firefights where tactics don’t help much, and there are few opportunities to outthink your enemy; the dude who starts shooting straight first wins.&#8221;</p>
<p>The guy who shoots first has always had the advantage in first person shooters.</p>
<p>If your strategy is to rush straight on and go head to head, and you keep losing&#8230;.maybe it&#8217;s time to switch up the strategy?</p>
<p>Believe it or not there is a lot of strategy to Modern Warfare, but if your like most game journalists you&#8217;re going to judge a book by it&#8217;s first few pages and then write a review on it based off of the jacket summary.</p>
<p>There are players out there who play well with yellow pings by adapting to their situation, rather than playing the typical victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Company 2: all good by The Side Mission – A gamers mag &#124; Bad Company 2: all good Company body on me</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/bad-company-2-all-good/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>The Side Mission – A gamers mag &#124; Bad Company 2: all good Company body on me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2897#comment-496</guid>
		<description>[...] from: The Side Mission – A gamers mag &#124; Bad Company 2: all good         tags: are-growing, down-the-gauntlet, gauntlet, icsi, india, rmc, snn, the-city, the-days &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: The Side Mission – A gamers mag | Bad Company 2: all good         tags: are-growing, down-the-gauntlet, gauntlet, icsi, india, rmc, snn, the-city, the-days | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MAG: good game, but is it bastard-proof? by chris</title>
		<link>http://sidemission.com/index.php/mag-good-game-but-definitely-not-dipshit-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidemission.com/?p=2463#comment-495</guid>
		<description>hey, no problem. I&#039;ve removed your payday loans link, but don&#039;t think i don&#039;t appreciate the sentiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, no problem. I&#8217;ve removed your payday loans link, but don&#8217;t think i don&#8217;t appreciate the sentiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
